Talk:Meet the Woo 2/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• No issues with the non-free use rationale.
• Also no issues with the infobox.
• Lead summarizes the entire article so that's good.

Background and release

• Well-sourced paragraphs; no problems here.

Music and lyrics

• Remove the comma after "throughout the streets".
• "that features" → "which features"
• Not sure, but I think it should be "an ode" instead of just "ode".

Promotion

• "posuthomous" → "posthumous"
• "released March 28, 2020" → "released on March 28, 2020"

Critical reception

• This section looks good.

Commercial performance

• This also looks good.

Track listing, Personnel, Charts, Certifications

• No issues here (everything is sourced).

References

• Archive all archivable sources.
• Don't use the "publisher" parameter for normal websites per Template:Cite web#Publisher.
• Use the "cite tweet" template for stuff from Twitter.
• Also use "Cite AV media" instead of "Cite web" for sources from social media.
• Mark sources from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark sources from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark sources from Time with "|url-access=limited".
• Mark sources from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

User talk:Some Dude From North Carolina thank you so so much for the review. I have addressed all of your concerns. Shoot for the Stars 💫 (talk) 22:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)