Talk:Meet the Woo 2

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on July 17, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Meet the Woo 2 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Meet the Woo 2 is the main article in the Meet the Woo 2 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 17, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
August 27, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meet the Woo 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

No issues with the non-free use rationale.
Also no issues with the infobox.
Lead summarizes the entire article so that's good.

Background and release[edit]

Well-sourced paragraphs; no problems here.

Music and lyrics[edit]

Remove the comma after "throughout the streets".
"that features" → "which features"
Not sure, but I think it should be "an ode" instead of just "ode".

Promotion[edit]

"posuthomous" → "posthumous"
"released March 28, 2020" → "released on March 28, 2020"

Critical reception[edit]

This section looks good.

Commercial performance[edit]

This also looks good.

Track listing, Personnel, Charts, Certifications[edit]

No issues here (everything is sourced).

References[edit]

Archive all archivable sources.
Don't use the "publisher" parameter for normal websites per Template:Cite web#Publisher.
Use the "cite tweet" template for stuff from Twitter.
Also use "Cite AV media" instead of "Cite web" for sources from social media.
Mark sources from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
Mark sources from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
Mark sources from Time with "|url-access=limited".
Mark sources from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

User talk:Some Dude From North Carolina thank you so so much for the review. I have addressed all of your concerns. Shoot for the Stars 💫 (talk) 22:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]