Talk:Let's Hear It for the Boy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Hear It for the Boy (song) → Let's Hear It for the Boy – Primary topic of the same name. Other songs from the album of the same name weren't as successful. Even without "(song)", it's more recognizable. Also, the song is more popular than the album. If moved, delete that dab page, and add hatnote. George Ho (talk) 08:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose sorry, can't see how removing (song) will make the song and the album easier to distinguish. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? Why do you easily enforce WP:DAB without thinking that it's a primary topic? --George Ho (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. There's an album and a song with the same name and the nominator wants to remove a distinguishing mark from one of them to make it easier to find both of them? Primarytopic works perfect for presidents and capitals of countries, but for commercial titles? --Richhoncho (talk) 22:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose proposed move, weak support moving Let's Hear It for the Boy (album) to Let's Hear It for the Boy. In most cases that I have seen, if the song is on an album of the same name by an artist/group, the album would take precedence as the primary topic, but either/or is okay with me, as long as the song isn't deemed the primary topic. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The album was viewed 1,700+ times in the last 90 days. The song was viewed 8,000+ times in the last 90 days. I don't think the album would qualify as primary topic, and the album itself is not as notable as the song, especially when you sing or listen to the song itself. --Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 00:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment only. Which came first? The song or the album with the name? I have never understood the perverse logic that makes the album the primary topic in those instances. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I researched and found out that the song went first. The movie Footloose carried the song and was released at the end of January 1984. The album came later in the middle or the end of May 1984. I'm working on the album article. --George Ho (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was a rhetorical question. Albums are named after songs, songs are NEVER named are albums. LOL. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't that a joke? Even so, I didn't get it. There are ...Baby One More Time and Oops! I Did It Again. ...Wait, Like a Virgin (song) went first one week before the album. Like a Prayer (song) went first, as well. --George Ho (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC) (Oops... it was a joke. I got it after I misread. --George Ho (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC))[reply]
  • Support - Clear primary topic according to stats given in the nomination.--Yaksar (let's chat) 03:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Let's Hear It for the Boy (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 October 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. One IP user opposed but never explained why, just to remind them RM is not a democracy. (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Hear It for the Boy (song) → Let's Hear It for the Boy – WP:TWODABS situation. No need for a dab page. The song is FAR more popular than the album.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 21:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Let's Hear It for the Boy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Let%27s_Hear_It_for_the_Boy&oldid=1203565511"