Talk:King Kull (DC Comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Recent split of King Kull's Fawcett/DC Comics incarnation=[edit]

Untitled[edit]

This is to inquiry as to a reasons to split off this version of the character when there is very little information to solicit a complete article. Some discussion before splitting would be advantageous. Regards. Netkinetic ^(t/c/@) 05:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My source, Rovin's Encyclopedia of Supervillains, states that King Kull the Beastman is not the same character as Howard's Kull of Atlantis. I've seen no evidence in the Beastman's character history to suggest a connection to the Atlantean. Unless something besides similar name, age, and dress is presented as evidence, separating them seems as justified as separating koala bears from true bears. --Kineticman 21:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're not the same character, and I can't see how someone would come to the conclusion that they are after having read the articles in question. -Sean Curtin 02:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relaxxxxx. There is no reason to get snippy lol. It was a simple question that's all.Netkinetic ^(t/c/@) 05:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just chiming in--they are completely unrelated characters.Konczewski 01:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jla135.jpg[edit]

Image:Jla135.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]