Talk:I See the Moon
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Possible copyright problem[edit]
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
The UK experience[edit]
In this little-edited backwater of Wikipedia, I get the feeling that this is the sort of query that will go answered until after I'm dead. However, here goes: if you listen to both the Mariners' version and the Stargazers' version, it's apparent that the latter is parodying the former - at least the style of the former, if not the specific recording. Which suggests that the Stargazers expected their audience to already be familiar with either the Mariners' version, or some other version(s) copying it. So, how were people familiar with it? Was the Mariners' version, or some British cover of it, popular on radio? Was a recording, or recordings, selling just not quite well enough to register on the top 20? Was the song common in the repertoire of live bands in the winter of 1953/4? --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 09:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Bellini allusions[edit]
Removed a section that cited 2 Vincenzo Bellini works as origins of the melody. No reliable source was cited, ergo a conclusion of an editor, ergo violation WP:OR. Further, I listened to the works, and while there are similarities, the editor's statement is every bit as unjustified as the Blurred Lines lawsuit verdict! Tapered (talk) 04:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)