Talk:Happy Working Song/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 20:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC) I'll take this on.[reply]

Accolades

  • "Raise It Up" should be mentioned somehow in the article, it sounds like there were only four nominees for the Oscars.

Live performances

  • Perhaps include the timezone, or at least "local time"? Call it eastern bias, but I was thinking "did she sing it on the red carpet preshow"?
  • Solved. Added "local time". And I actually couldn't find any source about her performing at the pre-show, but I'll keep looking.--Changedforbetter (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ack, sorry to waste your time. I didn't mean that she did sing at the preshow, just that without the timezone, it looks as if she did to someone not totally concentrating when reading the sentence.
  • You lost something at the end of the second paragraph... what did Vulture write?
  • Solved. Also took the liberty of including Adams' response to the controversy.
  • Nice, good find!

Well, that's at least a start for my review. More soon. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing intro, Composition and inspiration (especially love the second paragraph, that's awesome with the key, bpm, vocal range.) -- Zanimum (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I keep misplacing my review file at home, so rebooting the rest of the review. I can't find any issue in either Intro and Background and writing, so "pass". I've made a extremely small change to "Context, scene and analysis", no remaining issues. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, I guess I already passed the intro. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Academy Award nomination and aftermath". "References" is the only thing remaining. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, azcentral.com is claiming that I have cookies turned off (which I don't think I do, certainly not in both IE and Firefox) and thus not letting me see the article. Presuming that link error is just me, I'm promoting the article. If you also have issues with that reference, please try and see if archive.org or Google have cached versions. Anyway, it's a GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]