This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Yeah, a rabbit is a new user, or seems to be. Yeah, Hunters/Barbarians/Dragons/whatnot don't like them and beat them easily. Yeah, you can give them awards to pacify them. But the article doesn't actually say what a Rabbit does, what sets him apart from any other kind of new user. I can't tell if it means someone who just modifies small articles, adjusts major ones from time to time, or creates articles and leaves them hanging. Just what is this strange beast? Barren167 (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In order to be a WikiRabbit, one must exhibit these four symptoms:
This page is in need of expanding. This may sound a bit silly, but would it be OK if I added some more information on this page? Orlando the Cat (talk) 02:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The screenshot you added is licensed as non-free content which means it cannot be used on this page per Wikipedia's non-free content use criterion #9. If you want to add it as a link using the colon trick (like I did above), then you can. Whether it a link to the file and the corresponding text should be added is probably a different question. Perhaps others will post their opinions on that here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]