Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lego

Requested move

See discussion at Talk:Lego House In ictu oculi (talk)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed for deletion (PROD): Lego Friends (TV series)

FYI, the article Lego Friends (TV series) has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject thusly:

• "Lego Friends is an animated TV series based on the Lego Friends theme … The story follows the adventures of a group of friends in their hometown of Heartlake City."

The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:

• "Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG"

If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.

Thanks, A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

"stylized as LEGO X", was vs is

So two things that have been added to Lego articles recently. One, a lot of Lego theme articles have been getting this phrase added to the starts of those articles, eg "Lego Rock Raiders (stylized as LEGO Rock Raiders)". I wasn't sure if this was really necessary, as I feel like the main Lego article saying Lego is written officially as LEGO is enough, with the exception of themes also often written in all caps like Bionicle. Two, most discontinued theme articles have usually said "X was a Lego theme" but a few have been changed to "is a discontinued Lego theme". This change I do think sounds better, and makes sense since while the theme is no longer being produced the sets still exist. I wasn't sure what was preferred or closer to the guidelines though, this is just my thoughts. Ringtail Raider (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)