Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/emergency

Proably best to have more recently promoted fairly low-traffic FAs that are very unlikely to have eroded, as these might be going on mainpage at short notice. I'll sling up a biology article in a minute (3 biography???? hmmmm) Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you take the blurb you remove and put it in the nonspecific spot.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't thought about removing one...but okay, not a bad idea. Will get to it a bit later. Cofffee beckons. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the time we get to the fourth emergency TFA, the pitchfork and torches brigade would long have overrun FA-land.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you can keep an eye through the 17th, Wehwalt-- I won't be watching til after Christmas, family situation. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope it's all OK. Yes, I will be watching. I have the first unoccupied date, the 10th, on my watchlist.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If that Prince Albert one is ever used, you really ought to consider taking the Jack The Ripper nonsense out of the blurb. Even the blurb itself says that the theory is completely discredited and couldn't possibly be true (he was verifiably elsewhere at the time of the murders), and it's hardly one of the most significant aspects of his life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.136.64 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]