Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style extended FAQ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconManual of Style
WikiProject iconThis page falls within the scope of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.
Note icon
This page falls under the contentious topics procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style, and the article titles policy. Both areas are subjects of debate.
Contributors are urged to review the awareness criteria carefully and exercise caution when editing.
Note icon
For information on Wikipedia's approach to the establishment of new policies and guidelines, refer to WP:PROPOSAL. Additionally, guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of Wikipedia policies of Wikipedia's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Lead section[edit]

The lead section, on principles, was adapted from DGG's close at the WP:BIRDCON RfC.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  04:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In response to one post or another that was eventually adapted into part of this page, someone asked about the idea that "Robert Downey Jr.", versus the comma-laden "Robert Downey, Jr.", had become dominant even in American publishing. While this is not an article and thus not a place to cite a bunch of sources (spend that effort working on articles!), this was actually researched heavily. See the February 2016 RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 125#RfC: Amending MOS:JR on comma usage, and the WT:MOS discussions (now archived) that led up to it.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  04:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Essay addition[edit]

Do editors support the recent addition to this essay? GoodDay (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SMcCandlish:, feel free to mention your further updates, here. GoodDay (talk) 18:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, I did a top-to-bottom tone cleanup pass [1], in response to various criticisms and concerns. Specifically: removing various opinional wording, unnecessary adjectives, statements that might come across as unreasonable dichotomy, most instances of "you" (except where giving direct procedural advice), and most instances of "rule" (except where particularly sensible in the context). It's still too long, but it's better.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No one's been reverting since & no one's been objecting. Appears to be a consensus for your changes. GoodDay (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, some additional feedback from people at the ANI thread would be welcome. If they have concerns they can articulate into reasons to revise particular things (not just generalized dislike or scoffing) then the material would improve further. The intent of this page is to be accurate, to encourage useful approaches to the guidelines (and their revision where needed), and discourage unconstructive ones. It's not to "stake out a position", but I think my weariness with various disruption and finger-pointing clouded my ability to do that well for a while. A couple of my other essays in the general subject area also need similar revision, though I need a break for a bit. Dramaboards really wear me out.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  09:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]