Wikipedia talk:If MOS doesn't need a rule on something, then it needs to not have a rule on that thing

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Manual of Style

This page falls within the scope of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.Manual of StyleWikipedia:WikiProject Manual of StyleTemplate:WikiProject Manual of StyleManual of Style articles

Supreme Court analogy[edit]

If that analogy is the best someone could come up with, then either zero effort was put into writing this, or it's simply a weak premise. Reduce essaybloat. Primergrey (talk) 12:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely zero effort. E Eng 12:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't about you, but I prefer my wiki "thoroughly percolated" rather than just freeze dried instant. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about, "Because shepherding the MoS is akin to trying to use a manul as a head-warmer – right down to the likely hair loss and all the screaming in pain and terror ..." — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTMANUAL. E Eng 05:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]