Wikipedia talk:Allegations of allegations of apartheid apartheid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Best article EVER[edit]

Best article EVER. Kyaa the Catlord 12:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why the very vocal Estonian wiki-community is not offended by the absence of article about allegations of Estonian apartheid. These allegations, of all others, are so notable that Russia's Foreign Minister Andrei Kozyrev denounced Estonia's citizenship law as "quiet apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing in white gloves" more than ten years ago! This is a serious oversight on the part of the presumed anti-Estonian clique in Wikipedia. --Ghirla-трёп- 13:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent post. Furthermore, to underline its excellency, I suggest we open a pool where people can bet on when (and how often) this page gets nominated for deletion and speedily kept. >Radiant< 14:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be a kiddy pool? I forgot my swimming ring in the lockers. Kyaa the Catlord 14:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...This is so fucking funny. Kudos. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 19:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this misbegotten page, and have written and deleted about 10 comments that I'd really like to make, but which I probably shouldn't make. For now, I'll just say this. In response to Radiant's comment, I think this page should remain as a monument to the amazing range of what some people find funny. I find it interesting that with an arbitration going on, we have a group of editors who stand on the sidelines of the particular dispute, and who create or expand trash like this, or who find it funny. I was also a bit surprised to see who created this page. I hope he comes back to Wikipedia, but that when he does, he will see that it is not a good idea to make fun of those us who face potentially serious consequences in this whole mess, especially in a dispute that he is not even involved in. 6SJ7 01:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fall down on the floor laughing funny. Good job! WAS 4.250 04:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cheer up, 6SJ7. These are only allegations of humor. -- 146.115.58.152 11:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Check out who created the "alleged humor" tag and placed it on the page. 6SJ7 18:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI. It has been there since the creation of the page. It wasn't you who inserted the tag indeed. So what's your stupid point? Do you have any particular issues with the creator or the editors of this page? -- 195.55.55.9 12:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, the tag that is now on the page is not the tag that was put on when the page was created. The tag that is there now is a tag that I created and put on the page. 6SJ7 19:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
CJCurrie right though[1] . Intentional or not, your calling it "alleged humor" is funny in itself. -- 146.115.58.152 19:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was intentional. I figured something about this page ought to be funny. 6SJ7 19:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone up for Humorous allegations of allegations of apartheid apartheid humor allegations? Raymond Arritt 21:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Allegations_of_allegations_of_apartheid_apartheid&oldid=1078446023"