Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal

Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Ratchet & Clank: Up Your Arsenal/Archive1 - Old Peer Review

It's been a while since I've been properly working on this article and I still want to get it up to FA status but it still needs some work. I did put in a request at the League of Copyeditors but nothing came out of it so, depending on the outcome of this review, I'll put in another request if need be. Crimsonfox 19:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The most striking thing is the lack of references, most notably in the "Story" section where entire paragraphs appear to be unsourced. Have a scour throughout the article, and you'll see this problem pops up in most sections: the last sentence of "Single player" and the last bit of "Reception" are just a couple of further examples.

I think I've address all of the story refs now, apart from the 3rd paragraph down in the story section. Anywhere else that particularly needs them? Crimsonfox 22:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases, where you have dates (such as in the infobox), it would probably be more relevant to link to 2004 in video gaming instead of 2004.
- Not according to our guidelines. Pagra shtak 15:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Minor points which may trip you up on criterion 1a:
- The Gameplay is similar to previous games in the series - "Gameplay" shouldn't be capitalised. Done
- Up Your Arsenal is the first game in the Ratchet and Clank series to offer a multiplayer mode - "Ratchet and Clank series" should be "Ratchet and Clank series". Done
- PGNx Media has dubbed it a "combat-platformer" - I believe "PGNx Media" should be italicised. Done
- An uberly-thorough proof-read is a must if you want to get an article to FA.

Requested a copy edit over at the League of Copyeditors, not sure how long that'll take though. Crimsonfox 22:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read over the article and attempted to correct grammar and spelling but without someone else's input to check this, I can't go any further. Crimsonfox 22:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Development" seems a little light, but if there's nothing more to say then I guess it's fine.
It may just be me, but there don't seem to be many wikilinks.

Added a whole bunch throughout the article. Crimsonfox 22:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Una Laguna^Talk 08:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add article-specific fair use rationale to all non-free images. Pagra shtak 15:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? I thought they were all article specific and had acceptable rationale. Crimsonfox 16:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only checked Image:Ratchetandclank3box.jpg. Pagra shtak 16:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And what makes it non article specific? Crimsonfox 16:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To be article-specific, the image page must state the article. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item 10(c). Pagra shtak 16:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation and I believe I have addressed the issue. Crimsonfox 16:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked and only found a few grammatical errors (which I just fixed on sight). We may want some more people to look over just in case though.Aquzenn 14:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)