Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Erich Hartmann

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erich Hartmann[edit]

The article passed GA-class without any criticism I feel that A-class is possible too. MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is no discussion of the controversy over how Luftwaffe calculated victories that led to such high "scores for this, and other "aces"--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 04:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wandalstouring (talk) 15:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seems fine to me. If there is a controversy over possible inflated scores by Luftwaffe fighter pilots discussed in reliable sources, then that probably should be mentioned in this article. Inflated scores by fighter pilots existed within the US and Japanese aerial forces in the Pacific and could very well have been a problem for all of the World War II air forces. Cla68 (talk) 00:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pretty good. Support for A-Class. Well done. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not keen on the, in places, gushing prose. This'll need cleaning out before going to FAC, I think. You may too want to dump the "scare quotes". Not really the right tone of voice for an encyclopedia. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 14:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Eurocopter (talk) 12:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.