Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/U.S. Supreme Court articles by quality log
This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
June 4, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Rompilla v. Beard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
June 3, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Parker v. Brown (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Williams v. Taylor (Terry Williams) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 2, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Williams v. Taylor (Michael Williams) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
June 1, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Amgen Inc v. Sanofi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Murthy v. Missouri (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)