Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/November-2010

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.

For promoted entries, add {{VPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} to the bottom of the entry, replacing FILENAME.JPG with the file that was promoted.
For entries not promoted, add {{VPCresult|Not promoted| }} to the bottom of the entry.
Do NOT put any other information inside the template. It should be copied and pasted exactly, and only the first one should have FILENAME.JPG replaced with the actual filename.

	Archives
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December

Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Robie House[edit]

Reason: This is a high quality depiction of a historic building
Articles this image appears in: Several different transwikis in various languages
The Wright 3
Robie House
Architecture of Chicago
List of Chicago Landmarks
Hyde Park, Chicago
National Register of Historic Places
South Side (Chicago)
List of Frank Lloyd Wright works
Frank Lloyd Wright
National Register of Historic Places listings in Chicago
List of museums in Illinois
Creator: User:Rdsmith4

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support very nice perspective, well illustrating Wright's architecture, pity for the overexposured sky. --Elekhh (talk) 02:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per Elekhh. Spongie555 (talk) 23:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just noticed this image is in the gallery on the main article,Robie House. Spongie555 (talk) 00:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose So less EV --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was contemplating nominating File:Robie House HABS1.jpg.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 The Opera House in Sydney.jpg[edit]

Reason: Good quality image of the Opera House from the north
Articles this image appears in: Sydney Opera House
Creator: Adam.J.W.C.

Support as nominator --—Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:37am • 00:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice image. Actually I have never seen a picture of the opera house from this angle before. Spongie555 (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the right roof is cut off. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the cut on the roof. Also the alternative you prosed has a street lamp covering the left side of building. Spongie555 (talk) 23:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is marked on at commons. Please see there. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see it now(didnt move mouse over image at first). I think its not really a big of a cutoff. It just alittle bit of the tip is cutoff. Its not that noticible. Spongie555 (talk) 03:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support the original Acather96 (talk) 07:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support original. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:33, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:1 The Opera House in Sydney.jpg --Spongie555 (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adil Rashid[edit]

Reason: An image of Adil Rashid bowling for Yorkshire, taken just as he is about to release the ball. It demonstrates his finger position to gain the leg spin which he bowls. Has been used as lead image at Adil Rashid since 13 August 2010.
Articles this image appears in: Adil Rashid
Creator: Harrias

Support as nominator --Harrias ^talk 16:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Support the sharper one high ev and very nice. Spongie555 (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ Support Sharper version. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a sharper version at File:Adil Rashid sharp.jpg. Not sure if that is any better? Harrias ^talk 15:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new upload one is less blurry except i thought it was fine having alittle blur beacuse it looks like he is moving(which he is). Spongie555 (talk) 04:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave this one for the time being and see what (or if) anyone else thinks then. Harrias ^talk 07:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose per Extra999. Acather96 (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support the sharper version. You can see the tremendous reach of his second finger around the ball, which is remarkable and instructive for those unfamiliar with legspin. --Dweller (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Adil Rashid sharp.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 05:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Opera House construction 1968[edit]

Reason: Good quality image of the Opera House under construction, historical value.
Articles this image appears in: Sydney Opera House
Creator: PhillipC (Flickr)

Support as nominator --—Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:21am • 00:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support it's a good image and historical. Reading the article it says this is a picture of Step II of placing the roof. Spongie555 (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High historical/EV. Acather96 (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—the focus is a real problem. Tony (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 23:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sydney Opera House construction 1968.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 01:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apple[edit]

Reason: High EV, Quality image, Describes best in it's article
Articles this image appears in: Apple
Creator: Abhijit Tembhekar of Flickr

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think images of fruits have highest EV when show multiple aspects, i.e. exterior and interior like here. --Elekhh (talk) 12:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Nergaal. --Elekhh (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice, some EV here. Acather96 (talk) 20:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Looks ok to me. Spongie555 (talk) 04:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose much lower EV than File:Sundown and cross section 2.jpg. Nergaal (talk) 23:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Spongie555 (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco City Hall[edit]

**Original** - San Francisco City Hall, a Beaux-Arts monument to the City Beautiful movement that epitomized the high-minded American Renaissance of the 1880s to 1917, in 2008.

Reason: The picture has great resolution, very breathtaking, and high EV.
Articles this image appears in: San Francisco, Government of San Francisco, List of tallest buildings in San Francisco, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, among others.
Creator: Magnus Manske

Support as nominator --Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 23:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image and high EV. I have actually seen the building and it is very nice especially the gold dome. I'm supried there isn't an article about the city hall yet. Spongie555 (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and sponge. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 04:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Spongie55. Acather96 (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 23:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:SFCityHall.png --Acather96 (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solar system[edit]

**Original** - Planets and dwarf planets of the Solar System.

Reason: High EV and quality
Articles this image appears in: Solar System
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 10:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.Acather96 (talk) 06:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom also. Spongie555 (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support definitely VP, if not even FP. Nergaal (talk) 23:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why are the dwarf planets small dots? I know they are small but not that small. Spongie555 (talk) 03:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are. You should first get updated with sizes. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 16:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Planets2008.jpg --Acather96 (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fiji Goshawk[edit]

Reason: High ev and quality
Articles this image appears in: Fiji Goshawk
Creator: Aviceda

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 13:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 07:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom also. Spongie555 (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support as it is not a full lateral view. Nergaal (talk) 23:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Fiji goshawk savusavu june 2008.JPG --Acather96 (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dearborn Station[edit]

Reason: This is a high EV depiction of a historic building
Articles this image appears in: Dearborn Station
List of Chicago Landmarks
National Register of Historic Places listings
Creator: User:JeremyA

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A panoramic view of the front would be better. --I'ḏ ♥One 19:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Good EV, though a panoramic shot would be better. Acather96 (talk) 19:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Not a bad shot, but a wider framing revealing more of the building volume and/or urban context, I think would be better. The historic image showing the initial roof is also valuable. --Elekhh (talk) 02:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per idloveone. Spongie555 (talk) 13:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per idlove --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 01:59, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dearborn Station 060409.jpg --Acather96 (talk) 18:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clark Shaughnessy[edit]

Reason: For a nearly 70 year old image this is a pretty good depiction of its subject
Articles this image appears in: Clark Shaughnessy
List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees
Creator: University of Maryland

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support high ev and an ok picture. Spongie555 (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support although I would prefer a more white background, or slightly higher contrast. Nergaal (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 02:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and Spongie. Acather96 (talk) 18:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 21:12, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Clark Shaughnessy.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 09:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DME 4004 4000, Davis Junction, IL[edit]

Reason: This is a high quality depiction of a train
Articles this image appears in: Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad
Creator: User:Slambo

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 02:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom also. Spongie555 (talk) 03:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 21:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:DME 4004 4000, Davis Junction, IL.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 09:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incandescent light bulb[edit]

Reason: High EV and quality
Articles this image appears in: Incandescent light bulb
Creator: Edokter

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 05:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks ok Nergaal (talk) 23:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good EV Acather96 (talk) 09:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Looks good to me. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 21:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
CommentPlease specify which one of the two images you support. Spongie555 (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gluehlampe 01 KMJ.png --Acather96 (talk) 17:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aqueduct of the Gier[edit]

**Original** - Vestiges of the Roman aqueduct in Chaponost, probably constructed in the first century CE to provide water for Lugdunum (modern day Lyon).

Reason: This picture has good resolution and good EV.
Articles this image appears in: Aqueduct of the Gier, Chaponost
Creator: Taguelmoust

Support as nominator --Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 23:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 02:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom also. Spongie555 (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 21:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Aqueducchapo02.JPG --Acather96 (talk) 17:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kitten[edit]

Reason: It is nice image. it is the lead image in the article. It is featured on Commons also.
Articles this image appears in: Kitten
Creator: Aka

Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 04:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 20:05, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Six weeks old cat (aka).jpg --Acather96 (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Execution of Emperor Maximilian of Mexico[edit]

Reason: Very historical moment as the last Mexican emperor(only 2 emperors) is excecuted. He is in the middle along with his generals.
Articles this image appears in: Maximilian I of Mexico, Querétaro, Querétaro, French intervention in Mexico
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 03:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason i cant see the picture when its in the nomination hopefully other people can see it. Spongie555 (talk) 03:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see it too --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well if no one can see it then click the image so you can see it. Spongie555 (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice illustration. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 17:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Execution of maximillian mejia miramon.png --Acather96 (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping the Pilot[edit]

Reason: The picture has quite good quality and EV.
Articles this image appears in: John Tenniel, Otto von Bismarck, Wilhelm II, German Emperor, Maritime pilot, Dropping the Pilot
Creator: Sir John Tenniel

Support as nominator --Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 23:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support high ev and good image. Spongie555 (talk) 03:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:1890 Bismarcks Ruecktritt.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean Iguana[edit]

**Original** - High quality image showing the sharp detail of an Iguana on St. Thomas, USVI.

Reason: This is a high quality image with very sharp details of a very interesting animal.
Articles this image appears in: Green Iguana
Creator: AmericanXplorer13

Support as nominator --AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawal of nomination --As embarrassing as this sounds, I did not read the criteria stating that the image must be in an article for at least a month. I'll see you guys in the near future! AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 04:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Damn, the quality is good, I'm already looking forward to voting for it! --I'ḏ ♥One 17:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Spongie555 (talk) 04:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Kid[edit]

Reason: Great value for film history, the film, and Mr. Coogan. Photo is sharp, and is of good size.
Articles this image appears in: The Kid (1921 film), Jackie Coogan, Charlie Chaplin, List of American films of 1921
Creator

Support as nominator --Neonblak ^talk - 21:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To me the picture is really dark especially with Charlie. Spongie555 (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support: Lovely. ResMar 03:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per all above. Acather96 (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg --Acather96 (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starved Vietnamese man[edit]

Reason: After putting it up for Peer Review, I am confident that this picture is a VP material.
Articles this image appears in: Viet Cong, Starvation
Creator: Tom

Support as nominator --GamerPro64 (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV in starvation and interesting picture. Spongie555 (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still don't see why a '70s image is in b/w, but I'm inclined to support historical documentation. --I'ḏ ♥One 17:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Starved Vietnamese man, 1966.JPEG --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 02:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Livingstone, I Presume[edit]

Reason: This illustration is of high quality and good EV.
Articles this image appears in: Henry Morton Stanley, David Livingstone, Ujiji, Ulva
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator --Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 22:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV. Spongie555 (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good depiction --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Stanley - Comment… 11.png --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 01:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plan 9 From Outer Space poster[edit]

Reason: As a poster from the infamous film, it brings great EV to the articles about it and has good quality.
Articles this image appears in: Plan 9 from Outer Space, B movie, List of films considered the worst, Z movie
Creator: Distributors Corporation of America

Support as nominator --Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 22:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support If only because it's a very, very bad movie =) ResMar 03:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 15:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Plan nine from outer space.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mauna Kea[edit]

Reason: Good ev, high quality, I think it is a very good pic of a prominent feature...
Articles this image appears in: Mauna Kea
Creator: User:Nula666

Support as nominator --ResMar 03:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support great image --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:35, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support ibid.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spongie555 (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer a crop without at least 20% of the top and bottom of the image. Nergaal (talk) 17:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the rubble helps bring out the character in the image. ResMar 21:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mauna Kea from Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii - 20100913.jpg --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Mirusha waterfalls[edit]

**Original** - Mirusha Waterfall in Kosovo

Reason: very good picture of the waterfalls, including old pump/hose system
Articles this image appears in: List_of_waterfalls_in_Serbia
Creator: Flutur Gërbeshi, uploaded by User:Mdupont as part of the contest

Support as nominator --James Michael DuPont (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support nice image but it only shows EV for a paragraph. Spongie555 (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Spongie. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good framing, but the image is poor quality with low resolution (thus not so much detail), sky blown out, and unnatural colours. Most importantly, it only partially illustrates a list, so I don't see how it would be "among Wikipedia's most educational work"--Elekhh (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, leaning toward oppose. The quality's not good, plus not sure of the importance of a fake waterfall. But if it is WP:NOTABLE then considering it's geographic location (needs geocoding also BTW) it might be hard to replace, so... --I'ḏ ♥One 04:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
INFO The waterfall is not fake. When I was there there was a LOT of water. Here are some more pictures. commons:Category:Miruša_Waterfalls . This was one of the first submission from our photo contest there will be more. I am also learning about this system. thanks for your patience.James Michael DuPont (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So why the hose? It's kind of unnecessary then. --I'ḏ ♥One 20:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Tenniel[edit]

Reason: High EV and quality
Articles this image appears in: John Tenniel
Creator: 1889 Self-portrait of John Tenniel

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV as lead image and looks good. Spongie555 (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great EV and nice self-portrait. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)^{what's new?} 05:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:John Tenniel.png --Spongie555 (talk) 04:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flowchart[edit]

Reason: High ev
Articles this image appears in: Flowchart, Algorithm
Creator: SVG by User:Booyabazooka

Original PNG by User:Wapcaplet

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is a good example of a flowchart and it brings humor to the article it represents. AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 04:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Agreed. --I'ḏ ♥One 17:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support works well in the article Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Funny and well made. But it doesn't cover all possibilities of the specific subject being illustrated. If the lamp is not burned maybe there is no power in the socket (either the socket is not ok or there is no power)! Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really funny, besides it's a simple flowchart so it isn't possible to cover all the minor things. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:LampFlowchart.svg --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hubble Space Telescope[edit]

Reason: High Ev, quality
Articles this image appears in: Hubble Space Telescope
Creator: NASA

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I personally find File:Hubble -a.jpg or File:Hubble telescope 2009.jpg more educational, as it provides a sense of distance, and File:STS-103 Hubble EVA.jpg because it provides as well a sense of scale and well illustrates Hubble as "the only telescope ever designed to be serviced in space by astronauts". --Elekhh (talk) 01:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high EV. Acather96 (talk) 18:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:HST-SM4.jpeg --Acather96 (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty bell[edit]

Reason: Extremely high ev and good quality
Articles this image appears in: Liberty Bell
Creator: Tony the Misfit on Flickr

Support as nominator --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 03:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nergaal (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Liberty Bell 2008.jpg --Acather96 (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]