Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/333 Wacker Drive

Reason: This is a high EV image
Articles this image appears in: 333 Wacker Drive
Wacker Drive
America's Favorite Architecture
Creator: The Seventh Taylor

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very poor quality and small image size, not centered in frame, and highly reproduceable. EV is not high enough to accept those flaws. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 01:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Raeky. Also, a more oblique angle would be desirable. Jujutacular ^T · C 02:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This could obviously be cropped to be symmetric. What type of angle are your suggesting however?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - An angle that is not so head-on to the face of the building. Like this instead of this (not really the best example, but I hope you get the idea). Jujutacular ^T · C 03:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think a facade which is all about reflecting the surrounding environment should show a bit more of the urban context. Corner location not ledgible. --Elekhh (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Courcelles (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]