Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 27 July 29 >

July 28[edit]

Template:Goalscorers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Goalscorers. Ideally we want to avoid module invocations directly in the article space, so in addition to ensuring that the template can be converted to module usage, please check that existing invocations in article space can be replaced by the template. Primefac (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Goalscorers with Module:Goalscorers.
If I'm missing something obvious then please point me to it, but even though the template documentation says this template uses the module, I can't see any invocation of it.

UEFA Euro 2008 statistics uses the template, while UEFA Euro 2008 qualifying uses the module. Both look exactly the same. If there is nothing to merge, then just replace template code with direct invoke. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The documentation is a bit misleading on Template:Goalscorers, the module is seperate from the template. Module:Goalscorers is quite comprehensive and currently used differently than Template:Goalscorers. I think the idea was to have the module be able to also support a simple output currently achieved by Template:Goalscorers, however all the functionality has yet to be merged. Pinging Jts1882, who created the module. S.A. Julio (talk) 12:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The sandbox version of the template invokes the module, which either uses data in module subpages (if available) or gets the information from the template parameters. Most of the time the module is invoked directly from the articles. However, I can't remember how thoroughly tested this was for when the template supplies the data. The sandbox version works when I use it with the top items on the list of template trasnclusions, but with more than 200 transclusions it needs further testing.   Jts1882 | talk  13:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, probably There is definitely a redundancy here but @Jts1882: has edited it quite recently and I would imagine that they have a plan, so I'm not sure how we should handle it. I'm also unsure what the difference between them are. The module has some data subpages which basically seems like the parameter lists for big competitions moved away to module space, but I'm not sure if that is desirable. --Trialpears (talk) 23:49, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney submarine attractions[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation if a few more attractions in this genre are created. For "grouping" purposes mentioned in the first comment, a category or subcat could be set up. Primefac (talk) 01:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weirdly specific template with only three linked articles. Could easily be replaced by a small "See Also" section on each page. Uncle Dick (talk) 09:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • If this had a few more links I'd say that this is a definite keep, but it since it has only 3 I'm not sure. However, both {{Disney rides}} and List of Disney theme park attractions are not set up to find attractions by type, which is a valid grouping and something which a person would look for. Looking at WP:NAVBOX this template checks #1, #2, #3 and #5. --Gonnym (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Borderline but with only three items and no parent topic article, they can be sufficiently linked in each others' "See also" sections, as they already are. Add the {{Disney rides}} navbox to appropriate articles. czar 16:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 TVB[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WP:NOTTVGUIDE The Banner talk 20:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have to start somewhere...
But if you insist, I will nominate them all. The Banner talk 22:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kingboyk (talk) 03:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was discussion merged with 30 July 2019 discussion Frietjes (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004–05 Algerian Championnat National table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manichitrathazhu character map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 5. Primefac (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Universal Studios Beijing[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. kingboyk (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Studios Beijing is under construction opening in 2021, and no attractions have been officially announced. This template was created prematurely and is based on pure speculation, mainly relying on artwork and promotional materials that may or may not reflect the final design. GoneIn60 (talk) 02:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_28&oldid=909380320"