Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Magtymguly Pyragy/1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted, no consensus that the article meets GA criteria (t · c) buidhe 08:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-optimal use of government affiliated sources, as detailed at this t/p section. Fails criteria 2b — all inline citations are from reliable sources. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The reasons were adequately explained at this t/p section. --Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 10:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Visioncurve is the orig. nominator.[reply]