Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lomana LuaLua/1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lomana LuaLua[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Delisted.--Retrohead (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to do this, for he was one of my favourite players as a child, what with the name and the celebration, but this article is a prime example of an article going downhill after years (promoted 2009). The sections of his club career since then are woefully short, and there is nothing on his season at Rizespor. Even his return to English football at Blackpool is not a good section. Due to the obscurity of the teams he went to later in his career, experts on football in those countries are needed to maintain the GA status. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delist His post-Olympiacos career looks really awful, certainly less qualitative that the preceding sections.--Retrohead (talk) 14:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Lomana_LuaLua/1&oldid=894920932"