Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jim Raynor/1

Jim Raynor[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Closing as Delist per consensus. No work has been done to improve the article during this process, and all votes have been a snowball to delist. Kung Fu Man (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article has multiple issues, including being overdetailed in plot summary/written in an in-universe manner and several sections are unsourced. Additionally the reception is very weak, relying mainly on reviews and listicles. It needs to be improved or it'll likely be delisted and merged. Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist This outdated article needs a lot of work to meet its GA criteria. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 01:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. For the record, I reverted the WP:BOLD delisting of this article since it wasn't discussed ... but I definitely agree with this. Steel1943 (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist Whether or not Raynor is notable, the article does not live up to modern GA standards. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist A "multiple issues" tag is not a good sign. This article needs a lot of work. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.