Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Silent Night (choral)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Silent Night (choral)[edit]

"Silent Night" is a classic christmas carol. This is our only choral version. This file adds significantly to the following article:

  • Nominate and support. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wish that the second verse didn't take as many liberties. It reduces the Encyclopedic value a little. I'm somewhat inclined to say it'd be significantly more valuable cut to the first verse only. The arrangement is good, don't get me wrong, but for people who don't know the song, we want a really conservative recording. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose, but I'd probably support a truncated version. Just think that, for a listener who doesn't know the song, the second verse is far too creative with the original. Sometimes encyclopedic means being boring. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Reluctantly - It's that same baritone with whom I had issues with in A la Nanita Nana... he's just too noticeable and out-of-tune with the rest of the chorus, making the piece sounding disjointed, I'm starting to hate that GOD-DAMNED baritone... —James (TalkContribs)8:38pm 10:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Either the coordination between the voices is slightly off or their sound room is lined with damp socks, because parts of this are just impossible to understand. I've worked in a mall, so through sheer repetitiveness I know the lyrics well enough, but I'm struggling to hear them say those lyrics; the performance is very hard to understand. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Guerillero | My Talk 23:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]