Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/O Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

O Canada[edit]

It's nice and it has a good article atached to it (O Canada)

  • Nominate and support. ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 12:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I fail to find the notability of this particular recording. There are many on the O Canada article. Is this perhaps the first recording of the piece? If not, I find the Edward Johnson recording much more interesting. Of course, this isn't a bad recording by any means, its just that I feel we should nominate the most representative of all the historical recordings we have of the piece. --haha169 (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the French version instead? It's probably the best. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Theres some weird clicking in the beginning, and aside from the unusually loud static, I do like the French version. --haha169 (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It is not at all a distinguished performance. Particularly troubling is that the dotted rhythm is sloppily handled by some of the musicians. And they cling to some of the detached chords awkwardly. Is the volume supposed to fade away where it does? Bizarre; couldn't have been intended.... It was performed in 1915: is there a particular reason this is of encyclopedic value (first-ever of the anthem)? Just being an early recording alone isn't enough if the performance isn't really good, I think. I certainly wouldn't parade it in an article if there were a good modern recording available free. Tony (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not promoted.Ancient ApparitionChampagne? • 1:58pm • 02:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]