Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Hydrogen

Hydrogen[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2012 at 11:27:19 (UTC)

Reason: Borderline resolution, low EV as it has been replaced in Hydrogen and is now found only in one article. At the nomination, it was said to be in the hydrogen article at the time. However, the stable version at the time did not include the image; it may never have been included.
Articles this image appears in: Gas-discharge lamp
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Five Noble Gases
Nominator: Crisco 1492 (talk)

Delist — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added the picture of nitrogen to the delist nomination as well. The image was used in the nitrogen article at the time of the nomination, but it is not now. I have not been able to find when it was removed. Currently used to lesser EV in Gas-discharge lamp and Ionized-air glow Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The resolution is sufficient for that sort of things as there are no small details to watch. Many similar images in Gas-discharge_lamp#Color are also FPs and I don't know why the image lessens EV since both Gas-discharge lamp and Ionized-air glow are exactly what is expected to show. Brandmeister t 23:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Both have high EV on the articles they are included in. We shouldn't exclude them because they are not included in the article about the element --Guerillero | My Talk 20:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I like the images, but a using in the article: Gas-discharge lamp is a false using, because they aren't gas discarge tubes. They are simply "tubes" filled with low pressure gas inside, the main: without electrodes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Should they be removed from that article? J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think yes. We have images from real gas discharge tubes. Take a look here: and here: . --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've removed the images from the gas discharge lamp article. This leaves the hydrogen image with no articles in which it is used and the nitrogen only used in Ionized-air glow. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You can plainly see an electrode wire wrapped around the tube. How *else* would you get these gasses to glow? It's a gas discharge. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What is the true definition of a gas discharge tube? I think the electrodes must be inside installed not only outside wrapped?! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just because someone switched it out of an article for an inferior picture that they took is no reason to remove its FP status. Clegs (talk) 00:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EV is an issue. An image without an article has 0 EV. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Or has been needlessly removed from an article. If that's your only hang-up, be bold and use it in an article somewhere. Clegs (talk) 11:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's an "EV"? --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopaedic Value. --jjron (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]