Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ White Stork

Support as nominator — Bewareofdog 19:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. Not bad, but some blown whites, and appears a bit over-sharpened. --Janke | Talk 06:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Janke. -Fcb981 19:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear picture of the subject, well focused. High enough resolution. Nice colours. I feel it definitely meets the criteria. Jsc83 18:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Quality picture but not special enough for FP promotion. Background is distracting. Alvesgaspar 07:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Clear and sharp image.. but a tad oversaturated on the white spotsYzmo ^talk 15:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. Tough trying not to blow out highlights in a bird that is sexually selected for blown-out highlights. As for the background, I'm guessing that's not its actual nest (it looks like we're at ground level), so a selective blur would be defendable. Samsara (talk • contribs) 00:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 04:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]