I am nominating this image because the subject, the near chick, is very sharp. It contributes to the article chicken, especially to the latter part of the section "chickens as pets". Picture taken by User:Fir0002.
Nominate and Support | AndonicO 16:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. We already have one of Fir0002's day-old-chick photos as a FP. howcheng {chat} 16:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I realized that, but, does that affect this nomination? I though pictures were individually nominated, but if it is inelegible because of the other picture, please go ahead and erase this one. | AndonicO 16:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's not ineligible, but with such a similar subject as an existing FP, you kind of have to equal or better the other one's quality. This one doesn't. Oppose per Janke. howcheng {chat} 00:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute, but the heads just make a mess together, especially in thumb size, which lessens encyclopedicity (hey, can we invent a shortcut for that word? "NCTY"? ;-) --Janke | Talk 18:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Janke. The heads are just too distracting as they blur together with the lack of contrast.--Andrew c 21:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Second chick mixes with first chick and is not in focus. HighInBC 19:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
as a FP. howcheng {chat} 16:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
