Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tiger2

Support as nominator --Meldshal42_{Hit me}^{What I've Done} 23:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice snapshot, but lacks the clarity of an FP. Also, doesn't show much of the animal and there's a lot of dead space in the pic. Matt Deres (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Snapshot indeed. ^8th star 00:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Snapshot, poor exposure and comp 58.6.95.145 (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous (IPs) do not get 'votes'. Sorry. crassic!^[talk] 03:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Matt Deres. crassic!^[talk] 03:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Matt Deres points out, it lacks the clarity of an FP. Spencer^T♦^C 03:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The main issues are the blurriness and the less-than-optimal shooting angle. --Bowlhover (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . --John254 01:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]