Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Small Red Rose

Support as nominator — Barry O'Brien entretien 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, needs better caption gren グレン 10:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rather than criticising why dont you suggest alternatives? --Hadz^Talk 11:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Shallow DOF, resulting from a poor exposure solution, crop too tight. - Alvesgaspar 15:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose' I would agree that the DOF may be small but I dont even see the focal area shallow or otherwise. The whole picture is strangely muddy probably from motion. Its also not particularly striking. -Fcb981 15:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: I fail to see how this contributes to the quality of an article. Plus it has JPEG artifacts. ~Step trip 18:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a clear picture. Witty lama 01:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above and tight crop.--Here T oHelp 02:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - lovely picture, but out of focus and full of specks. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 09:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special about this picture, and it is not very good quality, nor does it display much photographic technique. Althepal 21:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]