Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Quince Blossom

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2015 at 21:45:56 (UTC)

Reason: It has a high quality and shows clearly the magnificent beauty of a quince blossom.
Articles in which this image appears: Flower bud, Flower, Pink
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: Diako1971

Support as nominator – Diako ^{« Talk »} 21:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my vote at the Commons FPC for this image. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, suggest speedy close. Not in use on the English Wikipedia. J Milburn (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@J Milburn I used it in the article Flower. Diako ^{« Talk »} 08:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It is beautiful and I could certainly use that picture somewhere - but only if the time mark is removed, with that mark 02/04/2013 18:35 - it is not so useful. We never use images with time marks logos or signature on if other better is available. You can notice the discussion Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Finnish Bofors crew, ... same problem there. Hafspajen (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Hafspajen I removed the watermark. Diako ^{« Talk »} 08:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose DOF and the overexposed part of the image are insufficient. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: And we are using it already, in Flower bud. I am not sure if this negative opinion circle can be stopped by now, they tend to go like an avalanche, but anyway thanks for nominating it and contributing with a fine picture that now can be added to more articles. Salaam. Hafspajen (talk) 10:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And also thank you for nominating an image for Featured Picture status! If you would like to nominate another image, please do so and don't let you be put of by your first experience. Hafspajen (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Hafspajen Hej. Thank you for your nice comments. This is the link of the pictures, uploaded by me. I've taken most of them myself. Some of them have watermarks. If you like, you can use them in articles. Some of them have watermarks. I f you want to use a watermarked one in an article, tell me so that I remove the watermark. Diako ^{« Talk »} 11:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - DOF issues. APK whisper in my ear 04:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor quality -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 20:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the reasons as discussed above, ~~and I also suggest speedy close as this obviously fails to meet FP criteria~~ -DUCK404 a (talk) 01:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Maybe not a speedy close, but definitely some issues that need to be resolved if it is to be an FP -DUCK404 a (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]