Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/McEwen Bridge

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2016 at 19:29:44 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Óðinn (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support either Could be a little better centred, but it looks fantastic otherwise. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 23:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Agree, off center (not too fatal a flaw) and seems to be distorted somewhat (fixable). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ALT - Looks nice once the distortion is removed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Explorer999 (talk) 08:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Striked !vote as Explorer999 doesn't has the necessary number of edits and account age to !vote. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support ALT Looks a bit overexposed at full zoom - the branches appear almost bright white. But overall the picture works, and looks lovely. Preference of ALT due to successful improvement with the corrections... gazhiley 09:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. I like the subject and the composition, but the biggest fault I can see is that it's way oversharpened. It hurts my eyes to view full size. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I find myself very much agreeing with Diliff. At full res it's pretty bad. NativeForeigner ^Talk 22:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral – Jobas (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]