Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mangosteen

An nice picture of a rather interesting tropical fruit.

Nominate and support--Vircabutar 01:18, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--The back to mangosteens are blurry, and the coloring (i.e. the colors in the background contrasted with the ones in the front) isn't FP worth in my opinion.Joniscool98 01:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. It's very close, but I'd like to see at least one full fruit in focus. Also, the photograph isn't balanced in my opinion (not enough subject matter on the left). --Tewy 04:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even the front fruit is blurred - Adrian Pingstone 13:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Soft focus even in the narrow depth of focus it has. HighInBC 21:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Illustrates a uniquely shaped fruit that the average person would otherwise have no idea of. Quality could be better though. Jeeb 01:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cool subject and good res, but just not a great encyclopedic photo. One fruit that's kind of in focus is cut off and still not fully in focus. You don't see a full fruit, the botton of a fruit, or full DOF on any fruit. 69.183.81.46 02:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh, the above was me. Staxringold _talk^contribs 02:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for weak composition, but mostly because you can't see the whole fruit. See the other image at Mangosteen - the top of the fruit is actually quite interesting. If only the shot showed a whole fruit! The two out of focus fruits are fine with me. Stevage 09:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. One fruit should be fully in focus. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't like the picture. --Neo139 15:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, at least two need to be clear. --Thelb ⁴ 11:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 08:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]