Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/High Falls ROC NY

Rochester NY, High Falls @ Night[edit]

Reason: why you think it meets the FPC criteria and should be featured (check criteria first)
Articles this image appears in: links to the article/s that use this image
Creator: evilarry

Support as nominator --Evilarry (talk) 13:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (motion?) blur. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does not appear in any articles. No caption provided. Muhammad(talk) 15:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The entire image is verry blurry. The lights in the background give of a bright glare, and that bush on the bottom is distracting. Not in any articles, either. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurry (probably didn't use a tripod in the low light?) and not in any articles. Clegs (talk) 15:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even without all the faults listed so far and more, it would still be a wretched nightshot cliche Motmit (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close Appears in no articles, no caption here. Low enc. Very blurry. Mfield (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, you should give WP:FP? a close read through and then look at WP:FP. It's a good try but it's not featured picture material. Thanks. gren グレン 06:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not FP material - massive camera shake (long exposure (30s) without a tripod, for some strange reason it was taken on ISO 100), out of focus, noisy, blown lights. Only satisfies criteria 2, 4, 5 and 6. Additionally, the nominator did not give a reason, caption or list of articles the image appears in, and the image page has no FPC tag - so it appears the nominator didn't read the nomination instructions or follow them all the way through. Not a brilliant indication of good intentions or effort in nominating an image. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 07:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 10:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]