Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Brigade Combat Team cropped

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Camp Shelby troop formation[edit]

A Brigade combat team forming a logo on a field during a farewell ceremony.

This fits all of the criteria for a FP, and it's a pretty cool formation of a group of troops; This article appears in marching band, Brigade combat team, and Camp Shelby, By Sgt. Jackquline Herring

  • Nominate and support. —Captain538[talk] 01:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. Blurry at full resolution, with some blown highlights (minor). Also, the back half is out of focus. But I don't know, the subject is interesting enough to make up for the photograph's lacking; that's a pretty impressive subject. Maybe if it were just a little sharper I would support. --Tewy 01:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose. For a subject such as this, it would have been nice to see more detail, especially in the people, but it isn't very sharp or high resolution, so this can't be done. NauticaShades 07:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I'm the original nominator and uploader from way back when. Staxringold talkcontribs 10:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, blurry, and doesn't really tell me much looking at it. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Here is the archive of the past nomination in April 2006 Glaurung 07:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It's a pretty cool formation, but I can't see a lot of encyclopaedic value to be honest. Maybe I didn't look hard enough, but I can't even see where it's explained why they're in this formation (like what is it a logo of, etc?). --jjron 08:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I can't see much encyclopaedic value here. I don't see any musical instruments. Therefore, I don't see why it's in marching band, but it's tempting me to write an article for "stupid human tricks". T Steinway 11:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]