Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Antônio Carlos Jobim

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 03:51:07 (UTC)

Reason: High quality 1967 image of Antônio Carlos Jobim, restored by me. Best EV of all images on C:Category:Antônio Carlos Jobim
Articles in which this image appears: Antônio Carlos Jobim
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Photographer unknown, restored by User:PerfectSoundWhatever

Support as nominator – — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 03:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – prefer cropped version. Good restoration. ~~Looking at google images here is there a better image with a suitable copyright license?~~ . . . . I did some checking and couldn't find any. Bammesk (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shouldn't crop someone else's image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Can you clarify? File:Antônio_Carlos_Jobim_(cropped).jpg was cropped at its initial upload and is the image which is used on most wiki pages. I restored the uncropped version. What do you mean by "someone else's image". The image is in public domain. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A photograph is a work of art. You wouldn't crop The Mona Lisa and so I don't believe it is good practice to crop others' photos. Cropping for specific uses like a newspaper is fine, but not for an encyclopaedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We're an encyclopaedia, not an archival site or an art gallery, so if deadspace is making the encyclopedic value of an image worse, yes, I think we should crop it. What extra value does the shoulder provide? — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]