Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Gwen Stefani discography/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by User:Sephiroth BCR 23:05, 3 November 2008 [1].

Gwen Stefani discography[edit]

Notified: WP:DISCOG, WP:ROCK, User:Escape Artist Swyer, User:17Drew, User:Cacarlo92, User:PiracyFundsTerrorism, User:Tezkag72.

This list no longer meets the FL Criteria. It has many issues:

  • It's lead section is not up to scratch, consisting of one paragraph and a parastub.
  • There are multiple WP:MOS violations, such as "US" and "U.S.", and inconsistencies with chart names ("WW" and "UWC"),  Fixed
  • unformatted references ([14]). Done
  • chart positions are not referenced Fixed
  • the infobox links don't link to the sections because they don't have the same names Fixed
  • the key, "—" denotes releases that did not chart. uses mdashes, but the tables have ndashes Fixed
  • "—**" denotes that a single was not released in that area. is unnecessary and the asterisks clutter the tables Done
  • The three notes for the albums are not needed. "European RnB, HipHop chart" -- does this exist? Why isn't it linked to if it's a notable chart? Fixed
  • ARIA R&B chart. Italics, really? I don't think info about this component chart is necessary Fixed
  • 1xtra chart.. 1Xtra is a radio station, and again shouldn't be italicised. It's also not an official chart. Fixed
  • Note 3 about being released in continental Europe -- not necessary due to the dashes in the table showing where it wasn't released Done
  • Singles sales and certifications needs referencing and merging into the singles table Fixed
  • The Miscellaneous section: What is miscellaneous supposed to mean? Collaborations? Then call it that Fixed
  • Music video directors need referencing Fixed
  • Unreleased songs should be removed. They were never released, and shouldn't appear on a discography. Fixed
  • United World Chart was deleted for being un-notable. The UWC chart positions should be removed  Done
  • aCharts is relied upon too much for referencing, instead of official charts, and there have been many discussions regarding its reliablity. Fixed

That'll do for now. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start working on this right away. Please give me a few days to get it up to scratch. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk Contributions 23:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And i'm helping. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment You left out the fact that there are far too many charts being used in the tables. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thats not importent. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Says who, BBHS? On the one hand, he's right - most discogs have around 10 charts so as not to fall into WP:NOT#STATS or WP:IINFO; however, it clearly shows that Gwen has had success in many countries (the country with the fewest chart entries is Sweden, with 6 out of 11 singles), and rules can be broken at times.
Denmark has three and rule or guidline is not very good since nearly no one is following it. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL That's one of the worst reasons I've heard in a long time. The validity of guidelines isn't based on whether or not it interferes with fans who want to add very important information. The letter – and spirit – of WP:NOT#STATS is that "sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability". Chart positions in a discography show trends in how well albums and their singles performed worldwide. Knowing how something charted in...Finland (Finland? Really? That's what, .1% of the global market?)...doesn't give readers any information they can't glean from the other fifteen or so positions there. Instead, it just makes it an ugly unreadable mess. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 04:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
BBHS, I'm assuming the two of the three in Denmark are component charts, and wouldn't be suitable anyway. Piracy, I tend to agree with you on this occasion, though if every one of her releases had got to number 1 there, it would be important to keep it, I think. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How US-centric. Finland? Really? Oh it's just a tiny country over in Yoor-up, it doesn't matter. As long as we have the US right at the front (out of alphabetical order, I might add), it's fine. Who's actually heard of Finland anyway? It's not like we're sitting in the middle of a giant encyclopedia. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk Contributions 16:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument is a straw man, and there was nothing US-centric about what I said. As I stated, Finland makes up about a tenth of a percent of the market; it has an almost negligible impact on how many copies a single sells. I also notice you didn't even attempt to address WP:NOT#STATS, considering the point I made about a table this large being unreadable is valid and supported by policy. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Stefani is a US singer, that is why the US chart is given first. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 22:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thats true, but his right about this wikipedia when it comes to US-centric. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 05:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm aware of the bias in WP, but we can't change the world in a day. Let's stick to doing it one article at a time. This one. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 07:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • More
    • Some retrieval dates are linked in references, others aren't. Fixed
    • use List of Record Charts to pipelink the relevant charts in the Albums and Singles table, instead of linking to the name of the country. Fixed
  • Looking much better, by the way. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 17:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What else does the lead need? I'm brushed it up a bit but I don't know exactly what it should look like. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk Contributions 01:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See The White Stripes discography for an example. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose delisting - Matthewedwards concerns have been addressed, just waiting for more comments, if there are any. iMatthew 23:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • More
    • I'm generally happy the way this FLRC has gone, and the improvements made to the list. I still feel the Lede section could be improved upon, and I was wondering about some of the entries in the "Certifications" columns. Does "Sales: 7 million" and "Sales: 4 million" refer to worldwide sales or US sales? Please clarify in the list. Finally, are there any other certifications in other countries for her singles? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_removal_candidates/Gwen_Stefani_discography/archive1&oldid=249701477"