Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket/archive2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket[edit]

List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second time of asking for this list. It has improved significantly since it was previous nominated back in December 2014. The list has also doubled to 26 centuries in that time. As always, I am happy to address any and all points raised. Thanks in advance to all reviewers. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Harrias talk 22:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* "The Proteas won the match..." – Probably not worth referring to them as the Proteas in an article like this; it isn't a particularly well-known nickname, and is probably more effort to explain than it is just to repeat South Africa.
  • Might it be worth mentioning in the lead that the vast majority of the centuries were scored in the first innings of the match?
  • The long key leaves a lot of white space next to it, could we put another picture in there?
  • Table looks good to me

Otherwise, this looks a pretty solid piece of work, well done. Harrias talk 09:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Harrias, thanks very much for the prompt review. I have addressed and actioned your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Harrias, I have just reviewed the list. Thanks again for your comments and support. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 07:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "especially in the shortest format of the game." this is unreferenced, and looks like OR without one.
    Removed – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "to the team scoring the century" I know what you're saying, but technically it isn't the team scoring the century, that's an individual achievement.
  • "Gayle's compatriot" again, I know what you're saying but one is Trinidadian, the other Jamaican, so I'm not sure "compatriot" is the right word here, the complexities of the "nation" of West Indies...
  • Another fair point. Changed to opening partner. – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "first ton" a little casual and not explained anywhere.
  • Ref 20 says "Archived from the original on 26 November 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2017." archive may be well out of date...
  • "Sri Lanka leading" comma after Lanka.
  • (1/2) etc is not listed in the key.
  • Fix the pipe for "Beausejour Stadium".

Otherwise nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi TRM, welcome back! Thank you very much for the review. I have addressed all of your comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 22:06, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Vensatry
  • August 2016 series –> 2016 series
  • Is the "top scoring in the first innings" bit needed? It should be quite obvious from the following sentence.
  • "Rahul's effort is a rare feat, one of seven centuries to be scored in the second innings." – The first-half is POV; it's better to "safely" rephrase the bit as something like: "Rahul's innings is one of the seven instances where a batsman scored a century in the second innings of a T20I match."
  • As of 10 October 2017
  • The ODI cricket ground where the match was played – Is it necessary to mention "ODI"?
  • Good pick up! Changed to T20I and fixed the link. – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cite the table
  • Given that we have the sorting feature, noting down centuries in the table seems redundant.

—Vensatry (talk) 08:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Vensatry, thank you so much for you comments. I have addressed each one above. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Vensatry! Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Center the ref column other than that support. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source review – All of the sources appear to be reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker reveals no problems (not counting the fact that the tool apparently has trouble with ICC links). Spot-checks of refs 32 and 40 also turned up no concerns. I'd say this is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Giants2008, thanks for your review and comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_centuries_in_Twenty20_International_cricket/archive2&oldid=1138486094"