Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ted Radcliffe/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 14:50, 12 August 2007.

Ted Radcliffe[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Notices left at TheoClarke (only editor with over 5 edits), WP Alabama, WP Bio and WP Baseball--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A cursory glance shows that this article has received little recent attention and has very substandard citations (violating WP:WIAFA section 1c).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 20:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has absolutely no inline citations. Aleta 00:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the inline citations from inotes to <references>. —Theo (Talk) 22:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, two edits since nomination. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c). Marskell 09:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 14:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove This wouldn't even pass GA due to lack of citations and lack of organizational structure. Pandacomics 17:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.