Wikipedia:Featured article review/Alcibiades/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 9:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC) [1].
Alcibiades[edit]
- Notified: all listed Wikiprojects, talk page notification from March 2021
Review section[edit]
As per Buidhe's talk page notice in March 2021, there is a dominance of ancient primary sources that are cited directly so there is a RS/OR problem Bumbubookworm (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. T8612 (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - ancient sources aren't great to be used in FAs, because the ancient definition of history was frequently not entirely what we'd consider reliable history today. Engagement has largely been formatting edits, not addressing the sourcing concerns. Hog Farm Talk 18:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no major edits since nomination (t · c) buidhe 17:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section[edit]
- Issues raised in the review section mostly concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist identified issues still present. (t · c) buidhe 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist sourcing issues have not been addressed. Hog Farm Talk 18:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.