Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/PlayStation/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 00:40, 30 November 2010 [1].
PlayStation[edit]
PlayStation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): KiasuKiasiMan 11:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because the article is comprehensive in covering the topic and anything regarding the PlayStation brand. It is well sourced, well illustrated and is neutral in its point of view. It also has a comprehensive lead section which encompasses the entire article. KiasuKiasiMan 11:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OPPOSE 20 non free images in one bundle with a boiler plated FU rationale, possibly the worst failure to meet WP:FA Criteria 3 in an FAC I have ever seen Fasach Nua (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I appreciate the work that's been done on this article so far, but it's not yet ready for FAC. There are multiple inconsistencies in citation formatting, problems with WP:RS and WP:V, a tag to be addressed, a huge ToC and many short choppy subsections, the image issues pointed out by Fasach Nua...it's just not there yet. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the fair use problem image, the article needs work to become a FA, stubby paragraphs, an expansion tag. I recommend the nominator remove the FAC and try a peer review or a GA review first, it shouldn't even be an GA. Secret account 17:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.