Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Psychology

Philippine Psychology

Reason: This article is well-written, it is self-sufficient, it features a new field of study which may further enhance the readers' curiosity, and most of all, it meets all the criteria of a Featured Article.

• Oppose no references, no peer review, no images etc. Batmanand | Talk 09:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Object; no references, listy. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Object:

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

• The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.

• Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like {{Cite web}} and {{Cite book}} may be useful here.
• This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.

• Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.

• Per WP:MOS, the first letters of words in heading should not be capitalized unless: 1) it is a proper noun or 2) it is the first word of the heading.

• Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

• Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
• It lacks images, which though is not a prerequisite for FA status, it should still have if possible. Suggest peer review first. Thanks, AndyZ _t 23:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Should be at Philippine psychology, as psychology is not a proper noun. Section headings should also use normal capitalization (first letter and proper nouns only). Tuf-Kat 04:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)