Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/January 2010

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gorgon class monitors[edit]

I'm nominating these as a Good Topic as I believe they meet the criteria.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturmvogel 66 (talkcontribs) 18:30, 7 January 2010

  • Support -MBK004 08:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Nick-D (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - fulfills the criteria. —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 02:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - rst20xx (talk) 16:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support OMT strikes again! Staxringold talkcontribs 00:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not really, these aren't in the scope of OMT, the only similarities is the contributor and their primary armament. -MBK004 00:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Heck, even the guns aren't battleship-sized, just armored cruiser-size!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • That was my mistake, I thought they were at least 10-inchers... -MBK004 01:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Ooh, boats. ;) Good work. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No real problems here. Jhbuk (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close as consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parks and Recreation (season 1)[edit]

This is a GT candidate. I've been working on Parks and Recreation-related articles for some time now, and all the first season-related articles have now made it to GA, so I think this topic is ready. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 20:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confessions on a Dance Floor[edit]

I'm nominating these seven articles for Good topic as i believe they are comprehensive and denotes the best in Wikipedia. --Legolas (talk2me) 12:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Well done. Pyrrhus16 18:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - this is a very good topic, I find the inclusion of the tour and live album particularly impressive, with the former being an unprecedented move - rst20xx (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually I do have one question. What's the Confessions Remixed album listed here? As a limited release I doubt it merits its own article, but I think details of it, such as release details, album artwork and tracklisting, should be added to the Confessions on a Dance Floor article - rst20xx (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Good point. However, there is absolutely no commentary available at all for the album. Just says that it was released as a promotional remix album and that's it. I don't think for these two lines it warranties an inclusion of the album artwork, which I may say fails WP:NFCC#8 grossly. However, I'll merge these two lines in the article. By the way what did you meant by unprecedented move? :) --Legolas (talk2me) 03:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    OK. I just meant that no-one had done it before - rst20xx (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 00:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]