Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TheJoshBot

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

TheJoshBot[edit]

Operator: TheJosh

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manual

Programming Language(s): PERL

Function Summary: Converts documents using one template to another template

Edit period(s): When required

Edit rate requested: 1-2 edits per min

Function Details:

  • Edit User:TheJoshBot/Status -> 'running'
  • Get list of 'what links here' for infobox being converted
  • Download each page one at a time
    • Phase the arguments for the required infobox
    • Insert the new infobox, with the old values substituted in
    • Save
    • If any infomation has been discarded, edit talk page, listing the field names and values
  • Move on to next page.
  • Edit User:TheJoshBot/Status -> 'not running'

The bot will reguarlly check that it is logged in, and also for new messages. The talk page will be used to control the bot remotely. At this time the only supported function will be stop

Discussion[edit]

Can you clarify what your task is? Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 06:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently in-depth discussion going on at Template Talk:Infobox Australian Place to do with the merging of about 7 different Australian geographical templates, into 1 super template (a bit like Template:Infobox musical artist. Of course, to make the transition easier, we decided to create a bot that will remove existing (to be obselete) tempalate refrences, suck the data out of them and then transpose the data into a new template reference, to be put in the place of the old template. In the future, this bot could also be used for other simmilar tasks. --TheJosh 06:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
can we get some diffs? Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I support TheJosh's request. There is a great deal to be migrated and it will add consistency to Australian place articles quickly and effectively.--Golden Wattle talk 18:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Im waiting for some Diffs before approval Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for a really dumb question. What sort of diffs are you waiting on; diffs relating to the discussion or diffs relating to the activities of the bot? For the latter, perhaps these would help [1] [2] --Golden Wattle talk 21:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some diffs: [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] --TheJosh 21:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see the diffs but those are under your account where those done by th bot...? Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 22:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just my 2 cents here - I thought one couldn't use a bot until approved so how could diffs be provided for the bot in advance of approval? Perhaps TheJosh should try his bot and see what happens for a few diffs.--Golden Wattle talk 23:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have been a bad man, all of those diffs were done by the bot, along with about 40 others, last night, with a 2 + 1/2 min edit delay. Dont worry, it was in manual control mode. --TheJosh 23:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When its on BRFA and we ask for a few diffs that is approval for the bot to make a few edits. it is not full approval, nor is the bot unapproved it is in the request/trial phase. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know I have ignored the rules in being bold, but 500+ articles with "This infobox is obsolete" on them is not a pritty sight, and is too daunting of a task for mere mortals. TheJosh 00:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bot trial run approved for 50 edits. Use an edit rate of 1-3 edits/min. Voice-of-All 16:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done 50 edits (in main namespace, a few in userspace of the status page). There were a few bugs, one with <ref> tags, and another with some lost infomation, but both have been fixed, and I will recover the infomation at some point. Other than that, all went quite well. --TheJosh 11:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any other templates that this deals with? Ay any rate, I'd review the code, run another 50, mention any errors, and then we can probably flag by then (or run another 50). There are quite a few pages in the category.Voice-of-All 20:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It can theoretically work with all templates. I have to do one template at a time, then change the code because the field names are different for all templates. I will finish Infobox Town AU (11 edits), and then I will do 39 on another template, probably Infobox Australian Suburb. Depending on how much data is thrown away in that conversion, i may enable talk page edits as well. TheJosh 22:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have just done another 50 or so edits with the bot. There were a few issues to begin with relating to the talk page edits, and one slightly funny (and fixed) issue where a page got replaced with its talk page. Other than that, the upgrades have been smooth and easy. --TheJosh 05:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have done another 20 flawless edits, and am doing another 20 right now. --TheJosh 11:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. I've looked over the edits and everything looks acceptable, at least from what I've checked. I'm going to assume here that you addressed the issue posted on your talk page on November 22. Other than that, there doesn't seem to be any other problems that I can find. -- RM 18:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/TheJoshBot&oldid=1138383846"