Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot 5

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

SoxBot[edit]

Operator: Soxred93 | talk bot

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: Per BOTREQ, wikiproject tagging. (big surprise).

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time run.

Edit rate requested: 10 epm

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: See summary

Discussion[edit]

Seems straightforward, trustworthy botop, and all. Not sure if you'll get 10epm out of AWB, but yeah, No big deal. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once, when I wasn't paying enough attention to how fast I was going, I managed to get more than 14 epm out of AWB for a bit. So yes, it is possible.--Dycedarg ж 08:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit worried about its edits like[1]. It says it probably fixed typos. Automatically. On talk pages. Eeek! MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 05:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That was when I pressed the wrong button for AWB. Soxred93 | talk bot 02:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody object to a trial run? — Werdna talk 00:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None here, MaxSem? SQL ^{Query me!} 00:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹoɟ ʇs(st47) 20:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you run this task on trial yet? SQL ^{Query me!} 05:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by operator. Apparently, I read the request wrong, and I don't know how to do it with AWB. Soxred93 (u t c m l ) 16:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.