Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 8
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: Pkbwcgs (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 21:35, Sunday, December 16, 2018 (UTC)
Function overview: The bot updates some ISBN warnings and ISSN warnings.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): WPCleaner
Source code available: WPCleaner
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: 2
Namespace(s): Wikipedia namespace
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: The bot will update Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISBN errors and Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISSN errors once a day using the bot tools provided at WPCleaner. It will run at around 21:00 (UTC) everyday.
Discussion[edit]
I don't see any issues. Low-traffic pages. Might as well automate so those without WPC can see reasonably up-to-date info. 
Approved for trial (1 week). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 21:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Request: I would like this edit to be run without the bot flag, at least some of the time, so that it appears in my watchlist. I watch this page for additions, but a regular bot edit won't show up. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95: My bot already has the bot flag. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm not using the right words. Here's an example: User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable is updated by a bot, but the edit is somehow (I think) not flagged as a bot edit, so it shows up in my Watchlist even though I have bot edits hidden. Does that make any sense at all? If not, don't worry about it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- 17 December 2018 changes - ISBN errors and ISSN errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- 18 December 2018 changes - ISBN errors and ISSN errors. It is not possible to put a manual edit summary in these edits so I can't link this BRFA unfortunately. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- 19 December 2018 changes - ISBN errors and ISSN errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- 20 December 2018 changes - ISBN errors and ISSN errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- 21 December 2018 changes - ISBN errors and ISSN errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm not using the right words. Here's an example: User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable is updated by a bot, but the edit is somehow (I think) not flagged as a bot edit, so it shows up in my Watchlist even though I have bot edits hidden. Does that make any sense at all? If not, don't worry about it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95: My bot already has the bot flag. Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Approved. Feel free to not use the bot flag for these edits so users can watch it. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.