Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/John Bot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

John Bot[edit]

Operator: Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs)

Automatic or Manually Assisted:Automatic, unsupervised

Programming Language(s): Python, using pywikipedia

Function Summary:Just Clearing the sandbox Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Daily

Edit rate requested: 4 edits per Hour, but you can chose too

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):No

Function Details:Cleans out the sandbox every 15 minutes or at a rate we can decide on. Will be run around 20:30 to 02:15 UTC. uses the clean_sandbox.py script in the pywikipedia framework.

Discussion[edit]

What is wrong with OverloadQBot? That seems to be working fine. And even if you were to run that bot, it would have to be continuous. Soxred93 | talk count bot 18:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just for more information, there are actually two bots that clean the sandbox. Dreamy ^§ 19:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OverloardQ's been doing it a lot more recently, though. That just shows however, that another bot like that is unnecessary. Soxred93 | talk count bot 19:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The other is Uncle G's 'bot. Dreamy ^§ 19:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OverloadQBot seems to be currently down. Either way I withdraw my request. I'm come up with a better bot idea another time. I apologize for wasting your time. Thank you for your input, Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 19:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, it wasn't a waste of time. I learned that Uncle G's Bot is still working.

Withdrawn by operator. Soxred93 | talk count bot 19:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.