Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JJMC89 bot 15

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.

JJMC89 bot 15

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: JJMC89 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 04:10, Tuesday, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language: Python

Source code available: movepages.py on GitHub

Function overview: Move railway station articles to railway station to correct the case

Links to relevant discussions: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RFC on Chinese railway station title/style conventions (permalink)

Edit period: One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: ~2,600 pages (~1,300 articles)

Namespaces: 0,1

Exclusion compliant: Yes

Function details: Move railway station articles to railway station (find: (.*)\bRailway [Ss]tation\b(.*), replace: \1railway station\2) to correct the case. The articles are listed at User:Certes/Railway station#Probably incorrect (permalink).

Discussion

•  Note: The code is the same as task 14. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
• Comment. The task and the list look reasonable. I don't think New Railway Station, Thessaloniki should be moved. Canfranc International Railway Station should probably get a lower-case "I" as well as R and S. Pinging Certes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  I agree with those comment. Maybe even Canfranc railway station (existing redirect), as there's no article about a domestic station there. Certes (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

  The list might have a few errors, and those will hopefully be caught. Not clear the New Railway Station is one; the article cites no English-language sources, and a quick look at books doesn't suggest it's a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

• Speedily Approved. The bot is using the same code as a previously approved task.—CYBERPOWER (Merry Christmas) 18:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.