Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ESBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Request Expired.

ESBot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Endofskull (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 01:57, Thursday November 18, 2010 (UTC)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): Pywikipedia

Source code available: No - it is not available.

Function overview: The ESBot will make Interwiki links, and it will check that links are working.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Not needed.

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: For a day, I'm guessing anywhere in between 300 and 500 edits.

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function details:

Discussion

• Please take heed of the relevant policy bits at Wikipedia:BOTPOL#Interwiki links. Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. –xeno^talk 14:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. Endofskull (talk) 21:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Any progress? Anomie⚔ 02:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for asking! I'll be done next week (on Monday). For my web link checker, I wait a week before I can remove it, to make sure the link actually is dead. Endofskull (talk) 21:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) Any progress? :) - Jarry1250 ^{[Who? Discuss.]} 11:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Request Expired. This bot is currently not approved to run. Please feel free to re-open this request at any time to obtain approval. - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.