Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Harej

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for BAG membership. Please do not modify it.

Clear consensus to become a BAG member. -- Avi (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BAG Nomination: Harej[edit]

Harej has been operating bots since before I joined Wikipedia. More recently he has undertaken the difficult task of running a date delinking bot. In undertaking this task he has shown a detailed understanding of policy and a willingness to comply with both the letter and spirit of complex rules. I believe he would make a good addition to the BAG.

Candidate acceptance:
@harej 05:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

What BAG work do you intend to do? I ask because we've had a large number of people become BAG members for the hat value alone. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will read and give feedback on ongoing bot requests for approval. I will approve bots for trial where necessary. I will approve bots for flagging and then use my persistent IRC access to pester a bureaucrat to give the bot flag. I will also use my weight to make the process more efficient where I see fit. Having gone through the BRFA process myself recently, I know how much everyone wants a fast process that works well. @harej 23:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

  • Support As nom. MBisanz talk 05:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support –Juliancolton | Talk 05:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I'm sure harej knows what he's doing, and I'm more than happy to support him. --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 05:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, no visible problems; the BAG needs more members. — The Earwig @ 06:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I don't see why I shouldn't.
    — V = I * R (talk to Ohms law) 06:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support experienced, reliable. Josh Parris 08:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. We need one more qualified BAG member for 2010. Happy boting! -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 10:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I see no reason for any concern. Regards SoWhy 10:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support As I know from experience BRFAs has become far too slow recently. I also know from experience that harej is a good programmer and will make an desperately needed addition to the bag team. --Chris 14:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — Rlevse • Talk • 14:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Probably non-BAG members votes are spit upon, but I think BAG members need some help and Harej is responsible and communicative. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 21:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a note that the reason why nominees are required to notify all of the pages that are listed in the policy is to ensure non-BAG members take part in the discussion (I know because I'm the one who added the requirement to the policy). MBisanz talk 01:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I believe the BAG serves an important function to ensure that the bots operate productively and efficiently and (most importantly) within the scope of their stated objectives. Harej has demonstrated a respect for the bot approval cycle, an attention to detail, and a responsiveness to inquiries during his own bot operations that makes me believe that he would be a definite asset to the BAG. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 04:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support As an experienced, respected bot-operator, Harej is very qualified for this position; I think he will make a good addition to BAG. I'd also like to thank him for User:RFC bot, which is a big help at MfD (and, I gather, at RfC). A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Clear understanding of bot policies in addition to being rather skilled at coding himself. Responsive to questions and thoughtful in handling situations. Would be an excellent addition. Shell babelfish 06:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as a non-BAG editor. Harej is competent for the role. JamieS93 17:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Has ample cluefulness. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: Looks good to me. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. --Aitias (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Demonstrated knowledge about bots. Jafeluv (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bot_Approvals_Group/nominations/Harej&oldid=1138378087"