User talk:Zocky/2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

picturepopups[edit]

Can you fix picture popups not to use document.write? Things like this are annoying. We have importStylesheetURI() exactly because of this problem. --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 20:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Zocky | picture popups 08:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. Can you can also fix the following, that occurs (Safari 4) when I click on IMG that don't link, but that have JS actions attached. WikEd and WikiMiniAtlas are examples : while (t.tagName != 'A') { t=t.parentNode; } TypeError: Result of expression 't' [null] is not an object.

It can probably be solved with while( t.tagName != 'A' ) { if( t.parentNode) t=t.parentNode; else return; } Thank you. --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 21:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zocky, I need these changes to get PicturePopups.js working on the other Wikipedias: http://paste.lisp.org/display/90286 . They're not very extensive! :-) Aidan Kehoe (talk) 14:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

raw PicturePopups code on Quedlinburg page[edit]

Your PicturePopups code showed up in the middle of a word on the Quedlinburg page. The text was "<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Zocky/PicturePopups.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">." I removed it.--Auric (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Zocky | picture popups

Location map template[edit]

Hi Zocky! I would like to ask about the template called {{Location map/Info}}. It appears that in the location map templates there is a name parameter, which is linked in the info sub-template. Does this 'name' have a specific function, in terms of accessibility, other than serving as the alt text for the location map images? Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 00:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, it's now used in the alt text and in the caption. Zocky | picture popups 08:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Image-license[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Image-license requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. ViperSnake151 18:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Hi!

I'm from pt.wikibooks, and I was using your tool "Zocky/SearchBox.js"... But the css is not loaded, so it is necessary do copy it to my monobook.css there.

It would be interesting to use

importStylesheetURI('http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Zocky/SearchBox.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css');

instead of using

importStylesheet('User:Zocky/SearchBox.css');

in the code. What do you think?

Bests regards... Helder (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Zocky | picture popups 11:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! =D Helder (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Image-license[edit]

Template:Image-license has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your BRILLIANT script[edit]

Thanks for the searcher in edit-mode for Safari. I've been waiting for YEARS for this. Bishonen told me about it! Tony (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture popups don't seem to work with the new vector theme[edit]

I transferred the small bit of javascript (that includes your script) from my monobook.js to the vector.js file but it doesn't seem to work. Am I missing something? Is it working for others?

Thanks a lot for an amazing plugin! I am staying with Monobook until I can resolve this. (Eeyore22 (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]


I figured out how to fix it. I remembered that document.write doesn't work when something or other happens, so I used a different approach of getting the script element in the page and it works now! Here it is:

if(document.createElement){
    void(head=document.getElementsByTagName('head').item(0));
    void(script=document.createElement('script'));
    void(script.src='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Zocky/PicturePopups.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s');
    void(script.type='text/javascript');
    void(head.appendChild(script));
}

(Eeyore22 (talk) 04:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Scratch that. It doesn't work. =/ (Eeyore22 (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Problem[edit]

Hi. If I am correct, you are an admin in Wikipedia, right? Me and some other users are having problems with user:Hobartimus, who is involved in constant revert wars with Serb, Slovak and Romanian users in multiple articles pushing nationalist POV, removing sourced facts that he dislike, not using talk page to elaborate his edits, etc, etc. Is there a way that Wikipedia community can deal with this problem? PANONIAN 16:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:ShowHide[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:ShowHide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If something is wrong, then change it...don't just delete new columns that are ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.58.102.143 (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maribor[edit]

I did not change the population for the city...I just changed the one that is for the MOM and it is from MOM's web page so it can not be false! I added many new pictures and some new columns, so if something is not right then change it but do not delete it.

population numbers (for the city itself as of 2008): http://www.stat.si/krajevnaimena/pregledi_naselja_najvecja_prebivalci.asp?tlist=off&txtIme=MARIBOR&selNacin=celo&selTip=naselja&ID=2620 And here is the link for the population development: http://www.stat.si/pxweb/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=2654911S&ti=Podatki+s+podro%E8ja+demografije+(projekt+Urban+Audit)+za+ob%E8ini+Ljubljana+in+Maribor&path=../Database/Splosno/26_kazalniki/30_26549_UrbAudit/&lang=2

...it's all in the references

As for the climate...if you found a new reference that shows the climate after the year 2000, then change the numbers, don't be destructive! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caborge84 (talkcontribs) 14:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here...I changed the climate numbers!!! They are the same as in the reference for the climate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caborge84 (talkcontribs) 15:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:$[edit]

As you had participated in the original RfD for Template:$, you may be interested to know that the deletion has been overturned at deletion review because of a procedural problem, with the redirect being re-listed here.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback on the relevant talkpage discussions would be most appreciated. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hallo Zocky from Uwe Kils[edit]

can you please vote again on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uwe_Kils_(3rd_nomination) . Best wishes Uwe Kils 13:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Climate chart/column has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]