User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive112

Poll: Aaron Kemps[edit]

versus

No. 1 background less distracting. Could use slight cropping at right to eliminate red. Durova^Charge! 06:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Number 1 -- Samir 06:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. *1. (per Durova.) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC) re Brewcrewer. LOL! Yes, now that you mention it ... Pdfpdf (talk) 22:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Looks a little less constipated. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 19:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(1) - Agree with Durova that some minor cropping might be in order though. Cirt (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 Bastique ^demandez 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 is better -- Tinu Cherian - 06:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 because of the full face shot but the red is a bit distracting.—Sandahl (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. - Bilby (talk) 06:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. The blue background looks less distracting to me. Sarvagnya 20:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
is 3 a new one? - I don't think it was here first time I looked - but it's the go for me :-) Privatemusings (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "is 3 a new one" - That depends on what your definition of "new" is. "I don't think it was here first time I looked" - No, it wasn't - it's the picture (from 2007) that is on the target page.
3. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, but consider cropping to make his head larger. Right now he looks like a skeleton. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 - the crazy background on 1 and 2 are too distracting. Also 3 gives greater clarity to his features. Euryalus (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Nice Modeling Photo —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleView (talk • contribs) 07:12, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1-- Y not? 03:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. vi5in^[talk] 23:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Aitor Hernandez[edit]

versus

Number 2 -- Samir 07:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2. Better lighting and contrast, more active pose. Durova^Charge! 07:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. per Durova Pdfpdf (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Raised hand looks awkward. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 20:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - Though it is a bit tall of an image, I like the activity in it. Cirt (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~~1 - Dimensions of 2 are distracting~~ is a good crop of 2 and works for me. Bastique
2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~2, but, because of the proportions, I would cut it a little bit at the top (until the hand) and at the bottom. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]
4 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 11:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unai Fdz. de Betoño: Is 3. anything like what you are suggesting? (I think, perhaps, I may have cropped too much ... )
4? ~~3? Pdfpdf (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)~~ Pdfpdf (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Look at the 4th one. That's what I said. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 11:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that is indeed what you said. And I agree that 4 is better than 2. For me, it's 3 or 4 - probably 3; like brewcrewer, I find the raised hand awkward. Perhaps something between 3 ond 4 would be better again? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In my opinion, if you cut the hand it seems that you want to hide somethig (maybe, he was doing this)... ;-) --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You make a good point. (And your example is an excellent illustration of it!) Pdfpdf (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Sarvagnya 21:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 for me Privatemusings (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3, but I can live with 4. (I like tight crops, but the missing had in 3 isn't quite perfect, so 4 is still fine). 2 is a tad too revealing. :) - Bilby (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Nice Smile sign PurpleView (talk) 07:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Can't live with the crotch on 2. -- Y not? 03:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. 2 is a possibility, but his arms just look too long? Maybe it's the angle... --vi5in^[talk] 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Alexandre Usov[edit]

aka Aliaksandr Usau, Aliaksandre Usau, Alexander Usov, but NOT Aleksandr Usov

(no previous picture)

No. 2. 3 has the best lighting overall, but this shows his eyes a little better and I prefer the pose. Durova^Charge! 07:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Number 4 -- Samir 07:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Giggy (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Less blurry then 4. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - Best expression. Cirt (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Bastique ^demandez 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Sarvagnya 21:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 Privatemusings (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. - Bilby (talk) 06:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Best of all PurpleView (talk) 07:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Alyaksandr lol the Belarussians can't spell for their lives. :) -- Y not? 03:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 is the one I like --vi5in^[talk] 23:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Anders Lund[edit]

versus

Number 1, better contrast -- Samir 07:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 but needs tighter cropping to eliminate the flanking figures. Durova^Charge! 07:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. It's an inferior picture but his smile is far better in this one. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 - The other one is a bit bright. Cirt (talk) 02:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 - too much obstruction on 1 Bastique ^demandez 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -better face.—Sandahl (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Just fix the brightness, contrast... Sarvagnya 21:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 right now, maybe 2 if you can fix per above? Privatemusings (talk) 00:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 w/ some lighting fixes? Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, as per comments about #1 Pdfpdf (talk) 13:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2, but please fix the lighting. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2, if the lighting can be fixed. A close crop of the face on 1 or 3, otherwise. - Bilby (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Y not? 03:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --vi5in^[talk] 23:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Christian Knees[edit]

versus

No. 2, better view of the face. Suggest cropping the sunlight out of the bottom and doing an auto levels. Durova^Charge! 21:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Looks weird in the other one.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 - Better expression. Cirt (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 per above. Durova^Charge!
1 —Sandahl (talk) 02:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Superior image quality. Sarvagnya 21:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Privatemusings (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3, except consider cutting off the bottom half of his body. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 - Bilby (talk) 07:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3-- Y not? 03:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --vi5in^[talk] 23:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Daniele Nardello[edit]

versus

2. or 4. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neither of 1 or 2; he's better looking than both pics. How about this one?--brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "this one" now appearing as #4.
2 is the best. Cirt (talk) 03:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 better facial expression. Durova^Charge! 04:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 02:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Closer shot of face. Sarvagnya 21:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Privatemusings (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4, absolutely. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- Samir 06:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4 vi5in^[talk] 23:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: David Loosli[edit]

versus

2 - Best expression of the three. Cirt (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toss up between 2 and 3. The latter is a better pic but he looks better in the former. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 3 best view of the eyes. Durova^Charge! 05:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. Pdfpdf (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 —Sandahl (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Lesser of three evils. Sarvagnya 21:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 w/ some lighting fixes. Khoi khoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 --vi5in^[talk] 23:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Dries Devenyns[edit]

(no previous picture)

3 - I like the expression the best on this one. Cirt (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 3 best lighting and best view of face. Durova^Charge! 05:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 best expression and lighting.—Sandahl (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Sarvagnya 21:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3. 2 makes him look like Golum. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3 -- Samir 06:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Francesco Chicchi[edit]

versus

1 - Best framing, centering, and expression. Cirt (talk) 03:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 1 Only one where his face is visible and not scowling. Durova^Charge! 05:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 best of the lot.—Sandahl (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. But dim the lights a bit. Sarvagnya 21:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
6 or 1? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
6. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Francesco Reda[edit]

(no previous picture)

2 - Face is less scrunchy in this one. Cirt (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per above.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 per above. Durova^Charge! 05:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Sarvagnya 21:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
0. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Frank Hoj[edit]

versus

2 - Looks confident in this one. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Frontal.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 per above. Durova^Charge! 05:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Graeme Brown[edit]

2. duh. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 more professional. Durova^Charge! 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2, unless the article is chest hair. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 per Brewcrewer. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Guillaume Blot[edit]

1. Although 2 is a better pic, it looks like he came in last place.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No. 2 better composition and brightness. Durova^Charge! 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Y not? 03:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Hilton Clarke[edit]

3? Pdfpdf (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Best smile. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 best lighting.—Sandahl (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 -- Samir 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Hubert Schwab[edit]

1. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 best.—Sandahl (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Imanol Erviti[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Inaki Isasi[edit]

File:Andoni Lafuente 2.jpg

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 —Sandahl (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Ivan Dominquez[edit]

2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -Too much distraction around his chin in the first one.—Sandahl (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Javier Megias[edit]

2? Pdfpdf (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 he looks more comfortable.—Sandahl (talk) 01:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2 -- Samir 06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Speedy delete 5 (G10 lol) -- Y not? 03:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
First choice 1, second choice 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Jeremy Roy[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Khoi khoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poll: Josu Larrazabal[edit]

1.--brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 —Sandahl (talk) 21:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1 -- Samir 06:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]